Some Test With LightWave Vampire CPU Vs 040 Fpu | page 1 2
|
---|
|
---|
| | Stefano Briccolani
Posts 586 25 Mar 2018 09:44
| Someone have tested the videotoaster cd EXTERNAL LINK On vampire? With toasterless switcher should work EXTERNAL LINK Toaster cd contains the video-switcher, ToasterPaint (sort of digi-paint 4), toaster Character Generator, ChromaFX and Lightwave 3d (4.0 and 5.0).
| |
| | Pedro Cotter (Apollo Team Member) Posts 308 07 May 2018 11:21
| The Polish Amiga Forum updated the LW 3.5 Benchmark results table. https://www.ppa.pl/forum/strefa-tworcow/28440/raytracing-i-amiga/32#m609895
| |
| | Vojin Vidanovic (Needs Verification) Posts 1916/ 1 07 May 2018 11:31
| Pedro Cotter wrote:
| The Polish Amiga Forum updated the LW 3.5 Benchmark results table. |
7.33x 040/25+FPU (A3640) for 85Mhz V2 Vamp! Great way from 0.14 we started with FEMU! And Intel Atom emulation speed is next stop! Toughest in real h/w category!
| |
| | Andy Hearn
Posts 374 14 Jun 2018 12:19
| So some back of the envelope excel sheets give me an average of 0.616326 "Jubimarks" per clock multiplier for a Vamp2. for a vamp2 to beat an atom N450, it'd have to have a theoretical x19 clock speed. Maybe the V4 with it's - from what I've seen - potential x16 clock, and other hardware improvements - faster ram etc. could be enough to make the difference...i'd be curious to see what UAE on ARM/Pi3 could do in the Jubimark test...
| |
| | Renaud Schweingruber (Apollo Team Member) Posts 380 24 Jun 2018 21:31
| World fastest Amiga result :-) Vampire with Full-FPU
| |
| | Gregthe Canuck
Posts 274 24 Jun 2018 23:27
| Nice! What clock speed? x13?
| |
| | Gunnar von Boehn (Apollo Team Member) Posts 6243 25 Jun 2018 07:17
| gregthe canuck wrote:
| Nice! What clock speed? x13?
|
Yes this was a Core with x13.
| |
| | Stefano Briccolani
Posts 586 25 Jun 2018 08:29
| Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
|
gregthe canuck wrote:
| Nice! What clock speed? x13? |
Yes this was a Core with x13.
|
This is the FPU for cyclone5, I suppose (Renaud said Full-Fpu). Am I wrong?
| |
| | Gregthe Canuck
Posts 274 25 Jun 2018 11:49
| Going from x12 to x13 probably shaved a few minutes off the time, leaving roughly 5 minutes due to other core boosts. That is almost a 10% performance improvement in this test.That's a big change. Again. Kudos to the core developers. :)
| |
| | Vojin Vidanovic (Needs Verification) Posts 1916/ 1 25 Jun 2018 12:23
| gregthe canuck wrote:
| Going from x12 to x13 probably shaved a few minutes off the time, leaving roughly 5 minutes due to other core boosts. That is almost a 10% performance improvement in this test. That's a big change. Again. Kudos to the core developers. :) |
Demo of v4 has displayed ~x14 speed. I hope we can expect that to be what is x11 now. Surely, Kudos for that. Finally, a 100Mhz Amiga in Amiga ways!
| |
| | Pedro Cotter (Apollo Team Member) Posts 308 16 Jul 2018 17:53
| Gold 2.10 x12 results: 50:39sEXTERNAL LINK Previous results: EXTERNAL LINK
| |
| | Pedro Cotter (Apollo Team Member) Posts 308 15 Jun 2019 17:09
| No Oxipatchers, no HSMATH libs, no tricks!!! Pure 68080 CPU Power!!!!Render time: 35m 32s EXTERNAL LINK
| |
| | Vojin Vidanovic (Needs Verification) Posts 1916/ 1 15 Jun 2019 21:24
| Congrats, its nice having Overclocked Vampire V4 running at x16 (113 MHz) :-) Surely, one can sing a lot of Queen songs! My choice is Dr Ring Ding & Senior All Stars, where "sound powa" is here m68k raw power :) EXTERNAL LINK For early adopters and beta testers "Test My Sound" :) EXTERNAL LINK German speaking part of crew are promoted to Music Monks EXTERNAL LINK French speaking part of the crew gets Mon Sound EXTERNAL LINK and Bosnian one gets Dubioza & Volio BiH Fiesta style EXTERNAL LINK
| |
|
| | Markus B
Posts 209 03 Jun 2020 15:37
| What about the current core of the V4? Any improvements there?
| |
|