|
|---|
| | 
Pedro Cotter
(Apollo Team Member)
Posts 308
14 Nov 2019 06:40
| Adoom Benchmark EXTERNAL LINK
| |
| | 
Robert Markus
Posts 18
14 Nov 2019 14:52
| Not bad :)
EXTERNAL LINK
FPS:
75.1 Pentium Pro 200
40.0 PPC604e-150
24.6 68060-50 What is the exact avgFPs?
| |
| | 
Sebastian Blanco
Posts 148
14 Nov 2019 16:23
| seems to be 50 fps average ?, faster than a ppc 604e 150 not bad at all
| |
| |
Robert Markus
Posts 18
14 Nov 2019 19:59
| Sebastian Blanco wrote:
|
seems to be 50 fps average ?, faster than a ppc 604e 150 not bad at all
|
As I see 50 is the min.
| |
| | 
Martin Randall
Posts 22
14 Nov 2019 20:13
| 49 thru 98. A lot in the high 50's and mid 60's. Overall average over 60, possibly as 65. Hard to tell without slowing it all down. YMMV
| |
| | 
Vojin Vidanovic
(Needs Verification)
Posts 1916/ 1
15 Nov 2019 14:32
| Safely we can beat p5 in doom :-) and ppc 604
| |
| |
Pedro Cotter
(Apollo Team Member)
Posts 308
15 Nov 2019 19:01
| Robert Markus wrote:
|
Not bad :)
EXTERNAL LINK
FPS:
75.1 Pentium Pro 200
40.0 PPC604e-150
24.6 68060-50
What is the exact avgFPs?
|
68.8 fps at 320x200
63.8 fps at 320x240
24.2 fps at 640x480
16.6 fps at 800x600
| |
|
Performance and Benchmark Results!