Talk About Sysinfo | page 1 2 3
|
---|
|
---|
| | Adam A
Posts 130 11 Jun 2019 17:03
| its a a3640 card with 68060 (rev6) using cpu adapter EXTERNAL LINK
| |
| | A1200 Coder
Posts 74 11 Jun 2019 18:59
| But this can't be right for 68060 results, according to your Sysinfo results it has about the same performance as a 68040 at same clock speed. Or 68040@50 MHz is the same as 68060@50 MHz with integer performance. SysSpeed seems to give 65 MIPS for 68060@50 MHz, but it is also flawed in many ways, seems to overestimate most CPU's performance and scores not comparable to Sysinfo.
| |
| | Knight Stone (Needs Verification) Posts 136/ 1 11 Jun 2019 19:20
| Niclas A wrote:
| Nice :) Can someone with a 060 also run this version so we can see how it behaves for that too?
|
i would be happy to run it on an A1200 with Apollo 1260 @66mhz. is there a download link?
| |
| | Vojin Vidanovic (Needs Verification) Posts 1916/ 1 11 Jun 2019 19:52
| Knight Stone wrote:
| i would be happy to run it on an A1200 with Apollo 1260 @66mhz. is there a download link? |
Yes, Gunnar posted it in this thread. CLICK HERE
| |
| | Knight Stone (Needs Verification) Posts 136/ 1 11 Jun 2019 19:53
| A1200 1D4 Board. Apollo 1260 68060 (50mhz part,@ 66mhz) full 68060 FPU and MMU, 64MB RAM 49,804 Dhrystones. 51,98 MIPS 37.07 MFlops
Hope this helps.
| |
| | Estrayk / PaRaDoX
Posts 21 11 Jun 2019 23:33
| A1200 Blizzard 1260 060/66Mhz. 49287 Dhrystones 51.44 MIPS 36.66 MFlops
| |
| | Gunnar von Boehn (Apollo Team Member) Posts 6239 12 Jun 2019 06:56
| A1200 coder wrote:
| But this can't be right for 68060 results, according to your Sysinfo results it has about the same performance as a 68040 at same clock speed. Or 68040@50 MHz is the same as 68060@50 MHz with integer performance. SysSpeed seems to give 65 MIPS for 68060@50 MHz, but it is also flawed in many ways, seems to overestimate most CPU's performance and scores not comparable to Sysinfo.
|
We should first clarify that each benchmark is different. And as each benchmark is different and uses different instructions - it will measure something different. The 68000 supports MANY different instructions, some are simple, some are very powerful. Some instructions are calculated very quickly, some instructions take longer to finish. SYSINFO executes 1 test program which executes a mix of instructions. The work code in SYSINFO is roughly 1000 instructions long. SYSINFO measures how many times this program can be executed per second and based on this it then calculates the MIPS. Its obvious the result does depend very much on the "mix" of instructions. The 68040 CPU is a good CPU and has its own strength. In some areas the 68040 is even stronger than the 68060. Lets look at some example Instruction LENGTH in BYTE Clocks 68040 Clocks 68060 ADDQ.L #1,D0 2 1 0.5 ADD.W #11,D0 4 1 1 ADD.L #111,D0 6 1 2
Lets calc the MIPS
Instruction LENGTH in BYTE Mips 68040@50 Mips 68060@50 ADDQ.L #1,D0 2 50 100 ADD.W #11,D0 4 50 50 ADD.L #111,D0 6 50 25
As you see the result of the 68060 can be higher than the 68040 but also can be lower in some cases. It depends very much on the tested code.
| |
| | Thellier Alain
Posts 143 12 Jun 2019 10:24
| Hello >But Sysinfo does not the official "Dhrystone" routine for this. Perhaps but the only result I want to know is: How many times the V4 standalone that I will buy will be faster than the last classic I owned an A4040/25 ? I mean using the same benchmark for A4040/V4 standalone
| |
| | Ronnie Beck (Apollo Team Member) Posts 199 12 Jun 2019 11:48
| thellier alain wrote:
| Perhaps but the only result I want to know is: How many times the V4 standalone that I will buy will be faster than the last classic I owned an A4040/25 ?
|
Then take the first post of this thread and add some salt.
| |
| | Vojin Vidanovic (Needs Verification) Posts 1916/ 1 12 Jun 2019 12:09
| thellier alain wrote:
| Perhaps but the only result I want to know is: How many times the V4 standalone that I will buy will be faster than the last classic I owned an A4040/25 ? |
10x in CPU in 040-FPU code, more once 060/080-MMX code is used (RIVA player, few datatypes,version of Netsurf, few games and emulators). Several times in IDE, many many times in fast RAM / chip RAM and RTG, and some even in combined AGA performance. Nice :) Add having USB, Ethernet, SD Card, RTG-DIGITAL-VIDEO,16 bit sound and plenty of RAM out of box, plus likely warp3D support in future, and there is a real "Amiga 5000" like.
| |
| | Simo Koivukoski (Apollo Team Member) Posts 601 15 Jun 2019 16:13
| Life begins at 200 MIPS! (Standalone x16)
| |
| | Niclas A (Apollo Team Member) Posts 219 15 Jun 2019 18:55
| Simo Koivukoski wrote:
| Life begins at 200 MIPS! (Standalone x16)
|
LOL awsome :D NovaCoder needs a new slogan :P
| |
| | Chris Edwards
Posts 43 17 Jun 2019 15:22
| Nice! great work everyone. now make it say 68080!!
| |
| | Przemyslaw Tkaczyk
Posts 155 25 Jun 2019 09:15
| Apollo Core GOLD 2.12 RC beta (x13 / 92MHz) on V600 V2
| |
| | Peter K
Posts 1 25 Jun 2019 15:27
| Apollo Core GOLD 2.12 RC beta (x13 / 92MHz) on V600 V2
| |
| | Gunnar von Boehn (Apollo Team Member) Posts 6239 25 Jun 2019 15:34
| awesome scores guys!
| |
| | Gunnar von Boehn (Apollo Team Member) Posts 6239 25 Jun 2019 16:27
|
| |
| | Andy Hearn
Posts 374 25 Jun 2019 16:49
| very very nice! :D
| |
| | Stefano Briccolani
Posts 586 25 Jun 2019 17:41
| Please release that v600 x13 core!!!
| |
| | Simo Koivukoski (Apollo Team Member) Posts 601 08 Jul 2019 21:06
| 080 was pushed to do a little more work per clock cycle and made an another world record!
| |
|